Skip to content
portalecm Search

A study · cases from the past 250 years, published in 2012

Nahm’s study of terminal lucidity: 83 patients who regained clarity shortly before death

Terminal lucidity is when a very ill person suddenly starts thinking clearly again shortly before death. It happens to someone who, because of a serious illness of the brain or the mind, no longer spoke coherently or no longer recognized anyone. In 2012, the biologist Michael Nahm, the psychiatrist Bruce Greyson, and two other researchers gathered 83 cases from the past 250 years. Most of them had been published by physicians and other healthcare professionals. There were patients with tumors, strokes, meningitis, dementia, and schizophrenia. According to the authors, some of these cases are hard to explain with what is known about the brain. In none of them was the brain measured while it was happening.

The study’s question is: what is known about patients who become lucid again shortly before death? We tell it step by step: where these cases come from, what they say, and what has been checked since. If you only want to know what is known, skip straight to the results.

Step 1

Before 2009 · The question

Nineteenth-century physicians wrote about patients who said goodbye with a clear mind

Illustration from Nahm’s study of terminal lucidity: 83 patients who regained clarity shortly before death: “Nineteenth-century physicians wrote about patients who said goodbye with a clear mind”

For nineteenth-century physicians, it was something familiar. Asylum doctors wrote about it many times. Some patients who had been confused for years began thinking clearly again as their death approached. They remembered their lives, recognized their loved ones, and said goodbye.

In the twentieth century, medical journals almost stopped talking about it. Cases kept appearing, but mostly in books and magazines outside medicine.

No one had gathered these cases to see what they had in common.

Step 2

2009 · The authors

A German biologist and a Virginia psychiatrist give it a name: terminal lucidity

Illustration from Nahm’s study of terminal lucidity: 83 patients who regained clarity shortly before death: “A German biologist and a Virginia psychiatrist give it a name: terminal lucidity”

Michael Nahm is a biologist from Freiburg, in Germany. He had spent years researching how trees work. He was also interested in unsolved questions about the mind. In 2009, he published a review of cases of mentally ill patients who regained clarity before death. He did so in a journal specializing in near-death experiences.

That same year, Nahm and the psychiatrist Bruce Greyson published a short article in a psychiatry journal. In it, they gave the phenomenon the name terminal lucidity. They defined it as the unexpected return of mental clarity and memory shortly before death.

Three years later, with two other researchers, they expanded the collection of cases.

Step 3

2010 and 2011 · How it was done · As the study tells it

They gather 83 cases published over 250 years, most of them by healthcare professionals

Illustration from Nahm’s study of terminal lucidity: 83 patients who regained clarity shortly before death: “They gather 83 cases published over 250 years, most of them by healthcare professionals”

The four authors searched books and journals from the past 250 years. They found 83 cases of terminal lucidity, published by 55 different authors. Most of these authors were professionals working in healthcare. Of these cases, 54 described how the illness had progressed, and among them there were 22 women and 32 men.

They also found 18 physicians or caregivers who said they had seen terminal lucidity but gave no details. Apart from the 83, they added recent cases that some people had told them about directly.

The authors point out the limits of this collection. In the nineteenth-century cases, the diagnoses were outdated, imprecise, or missing. Some cases, especially those published outside medicine, may have been embellished in the telling. And in some, the improvement may have coincided with death by chance.

The cases came from very different illnesses.

Step 4

Nineteenth and twentieth centuries · The cases · As the study tells it

There are cases with tumors, strokes, meningitis, dementia, and schizophrenia

Illustration from Nahm’s study of terminal lucidity: 83 patients who regained clarity shortly before death: “There are cases with tumors, strokes, meningitis, dementia, and schizophrenia”

The study arranges the cases by illness. These are some of the ones it describes.

  • A brain abscess, in 1822. A 17-year-old boy had been in the hospital for 18 days. He was in constant pain, he was vomiting, and he was losing his memory. On day 19, he suddenly got up, said nothing hurt anymore, and said he planned to leave the hospital the next day. He died a quarter of an hour later. The autopsy found two pockets of pus the size of a hen’s egg in the front part of his brain.
  • Two strokes, in a 91-year-old woman. The second stroke had left her unable to move or speak. One day, her daughter heard her exclaim something. The woman sat up in bed, raised her arms, and said her late husband’s name in a clear voice. Then she fell back and died.
  • Alzheimer’s, in an 81-year-old woman in Iceland. She hadn’t recognized her family or spoken for a year. One day she sat up, looked at her son, and told him she was going to recite a verse for him. In a clear voice, she recited the first stanza of a psalm by an Icelandic poet. Her son wrote it down on the spot. Afterward she became unresponsive again, and she died a month later.
  • A cancer that had spread to the brain. A young man had lung cancer that had reached his brain. According to a 2007 article in Time magazine, a scan showed that he had little brain tissue left. A nurse and his wife said that, an hour before he died, he woke up and talked with his family for about five minutes.
  • Schizophrenia. In 1975, two physicians described three patients who had been hospitalized for 11, 20, and 27 years. Shortly before they died, all three were almost normal.

The cases with an autopsy all date from the nineteenth century. The recent cases come from what relatives, nurses, or magazines reported.

What remained unknown was whether this happens often or very rarely.

Step 5

1844 and 2008 · How often · As the study tells it

They find only two figures, one from an 1844 book about an asylum and one from a nursing home in 2008

Illustration from Nahm’s study of terminal lucidity: 83 patients who regained clarity shortly before death: “They find only two figures, one from an 1844 book about an asylum and one from a nursing home in 2008”

The authors looked for how often terminal lucidity happens. They found only two figures.

The first comes from an 1844 book that reviewed the figures from a British asylum. There, 139 patients died between 1796 and 1841. Of these, 13 in 100 died in a considerably better mental state than they had been in before.

The second is from 2008. An English team asked the nurses and care assistants at a nursing home. Seven in ten said they had seen terminal lucidity in the previous five years. These were patients with dementia or confusion who regained clarity a few days before they died.

The two figures measure different things. The first counts patients. The second counts caregivers who saw it at least once.

Of all the cases, there is one that is cited more than any other.

Step 6

March 1, 1922 · Germany · As told by the director and the physician of her institution

A woman who had never spoken sang for half an hour before she died, according to the director and the physician of her institution

Illustration from Nahm’s study of terminal lucidity: 83 patients who regained clarity shortly before death: “A woman who had never spoken sang for half an hour before she died, according to the director and the physician of her institution”

Anna Katharina Ehmer, known as Käthe, lived at Hephata, a residential institution for people with mental disabilities in central Germany. She had arrived there at the age of six. She died there on March 1, 1922, at 26.

The Protestant pastor Friedrich Happich ran the part of the institution where Käthe lived. According to him, Käthe had had a very severe disability since birth and had never said a single word. The institution’s physician, Wilhelm Wittneben, wrote that she had had meningitis many times and that it had badly damaged her brain. She also had tuberculosis, and one of her legs had been amputated because of it.

Both men said that, before she died, Käthe sang farewell songs for half an hour, with clear words. Then she died peacefully. According to Happich, the physician said he couldn’t explain it.

In 2014, Nahm and Greyson studied how the case had been told. The institution’s register of deaths confirms Käthe’s dates. The physician first spoke about the case in 1926, without giving Käthe’s name. The first full account dates from 1930, eight years after her death. The two witnesses told it at least five times, in almost the same words.

No autopsy was done. According to Happich, in a 1934 text, the physician said an autopsy could show that Käthe’s brain didn’t allow her to think. Both men used the case to oppose the Nazis’ killing of the mentally ill. They were, however, in favor of sterilizing them.

Nahm and Greyson write that today it is hard to say with certainty whether the case is authentic. The neuroscientist who writes online as Neuroskeptic analyzed it in 2014. Neuroskeptic points out that the physician never explained what damage Käthe had in her brain or how he knew. Neuroskeptic adds that, if Käthe didn’t speak, that doesn’t prove she was unable to speak. And Neuroskeptic notes that singing uses different parts of the brain from those used for speaking.

With all these cases, the authors drew their conclusions.

Step 7

2012 · The conclusion · As the study tells it

The authors think some cases are hard to explain with what is known about the brain

Illustration from Nahm’s study of terminal lucidity: 83 patients who regained clarity shortly before death: “The authors think some cases are hard to explain with what is known about the brain”

According to the authors, some cases pose difficulties for the explanations currently given of how the brain produces the mind. These are mainly the cases in which a tumor, a stroke, or Alzheimer’s had destroyed part of the brain. They write that, during terminal lucidity, memory and thinking might work in a way different from that of the normal brain.

At the same time, they think it isn’t yet possible to know why it happens. There may not be a single cause. As early as 1826, a physician distinguished two forms of lucidity before death. In one, the patient’s confusion fades little by little as the body weakens. In the other, clarity arrives suddenly, just before death.

The authors themselves propose a possible explanation in the brain. A patient who loses a lot of weight at the end of life might also lose some brain volume. That would lower the pressure that a tumor or a lesion creates inside the skull, and the brain might work again for a while. They also cite studies suggesting that some of the damage of Alzheimer’s might be reversible. They don’t know whether that is enough to explain a complete recovery.

They call for more research. They think terminal lucidity can teach us how memory and thinking work at the end of life. And they think knowing about it would help physicians and families be prepared if they see it.

In the following years, other teams began to study it.

Step 8

2019 to 2025 · What came next

Caregivers describe lucidity close to death, and the video study also finds it months earlier

Illustration from Nahm’s study of terminal lucidity: 83 patients who regained clarity shortly before death: “Caregivers describe lucidity close to death, and the video study also finds it months earlier”

In 2018, the US National Institute on Aging brought together a group of experts. Among them were Greyson and the psychologist Alexander Batthyány, from a university in Budapest. Nahm co-authored the article that came out of that meeting. It was published in 2019. The article called the lucidity that occurs in people with dementia paradoxical lucidity. It is called paradoxical because it happens in people who, because of their dementia, were thought to be no longer able to communicate.

The two terms are used for similar things, and experts don’t agree on where the difference lies. For Nahm, terminal lucidity is the kind that happens shortly before death, with any illness. Paradoxical lucidity is the kind that happens in advanced dementia, even when death is still months away.

In 2021, Batthyány and Greyson published an online survey of caregivers who had seen an episode in the previous 12 months. They gathered 124 cases of people with dementia. In almost 80 in 100, the caregivers said the patient spoke clearly and almost normally. And in 94 in 100 cases, the patient died within the following week.

In 2025, a University of Wisconsin team filmed 19 people with very advanced dementia for months. There were 9 lucid moments in 3 of them. They happened between 9 days and 20 months before their death. We cover this in the Gilmore-Bykovskyi study.

The survey and the video study don’t entirely contradict each other. The survey only collected cases that caregivers remembered, and the farewell at the bedside may be what people remember most. The authors themselves urge caution in linking these episodes to imminent death. The video study didn’t depend on memory, and it didn’t find that lucidity clustered close to death.

There is still something no one has done.

Step 9

2023 · What is missing

In about 600 cases, no one has measured the brain while the patient was lucid

Illustration from Nahm’s study of terminal lucidity: 83 patients who regained clarity shortly before death: “In about 600 cases, no one has measured the brain while the patient was lucid”

In 2023, Batthyány wrote a letter to a journal specializing in near-death experiences. He estimated that there were already about 600 documented cases of terminal lucidity. And he wrote that in none of them had brain activity been measured during the episode. A review of 30 studies published in 2024 doesn’t include any such measurement either.

In that letter, Batthyány was correcting a 2023 book by Raymond Moody and Paul Perry. The book said terminal lucidity sometimes happens in people who are brain-dead, with no activity in the brain. Batthyány replied that no such case is known. All the patients in the known cases were alive, they were breathing, and their brains worked well enough to keep them alive. In 2024, Nahm agreed with him on that point.

The question from the beginning remains: what is known about patients who become lucid again before death? Let’s look at what is known and what isn’t.

What do we know?

What Nahm’s study gathered

What it found

  • There have been accounts of terminal lucidity for at least 250 years. The authors gathered 83 cases published by 55 authors, most of them healthcare professionals.
  • It is described in very different illnesses. There are cases with brain abscesses and brain tumors, strokes, meningitis, dementia, schizophrenia, and mood disorders.
  • Some old cases have an autopsy. In the boy from 1822, the autopsy found two pockets of pus in the front part of the brain.
  • According to the two figures available, it isn’t rare. In a British asylum, 13 in 100 patients died in a considerably better mental state. In an English nursing home, 7 in 10 caregivers said they had seen it in five years.

What it couldn’t know

  • What happens in the brain during an episode. In no case was the brain measured while the patient was lucid.
  • How many patients have it today. One figure is from 1844, and the other counts what caregivers remember, not patients.
  • Whether the accounts were embellished in the telling. Some were published outside medicine, and the authors acknowledge that they may have been embellished.
  • How much damage each patient’s brain had. The old diagnoses were imprecise, and the recent cases have no autopsy.
  • Whether it is a single phenomenon. The authors themselves think it may have different causes depending on the illness.

How each side reads it

Those who think it puts to the test the idea that the mind depends only on the brain

  • Michael Nahm, Bruce Greyson, Emily Williams Kelly, and Erlendur Haraldsson, in 2012. They write that some cases, especially with tumors, strokes, or Alzheimer’s, pose difficulties for current explanations of the brain and the mind.
  • Alexander Batthyány, a psychologist at Pázmány Péter Catholic University in Budapest, in 2023. He sees many similarities between terminal lucidity and near-death experiences. In both, he writes, one sees a mind working clearly when the brain is working very little.

Those who think it has an explanation in the brain or that the accounts aren’t enough

  • The US National Institute on Aging expert group, in 2019, with Greyson, Batthyány, and Nahm among the authors. They propose that, if paradoxical lucidity is confirmed, some of the damage of severe dementia is reversible. It would be a failure of function rather than a permanent loss.
  • The neuroscientist Ariel Zeleznikow-Johnston, in 2026. He says he doesn’t know whether terminal lucidity exists. He points out that the person who describes it is usually a relative who wants to communicate with the patient. And he notes that, according to recent studies, most episodes don’t happen in the last days of life. He proposes two explanations in the brain: that the brain’s swelling goes down at the end of life, or that damaged networks reorganize.
  • The psychologist Steven Pinker, of Harvard University, in an email published by Skeptic magazine in 2025. He writes that everything rests on the impressions of relatives and caregivers, without any objective evidence.

What the data allow us to say

Lucidity before death has been described for centuries, in very different illnesses, and it is described mainly by physicians and caregivers. Since 2025, there has also been a study that recorded it on video in people with very advanced dementia. Many researchers accept that it happens, although some, such as Zeleznikow-Johnston, say they don’t know yet. What is most disputed is why it happens.

The cases in this study don’t prove that the mind can work without the brain. No one measured the brain during an episode, and all these patients had a living brain. Nor do they prove the opposite. There are explanations in the brain, such as the brain’s swelling going down or some of the damage of Alzheimer’s being reversible. No one has tested them during an episode. The explanations from both sides about the mind and the brain are in What does science say about near-death experiences?

What would settle it

  • Measuring the brain during an episode. If brain activity returned to normal while the patient was lucid, the brain-based explanation would win. If there were lucidity without organized activity in the brain, it would be hard to explain with what is known about the brain.
  • Doing an autopsy on people whose episodes were recorded and checked. That would show how much damage there was in the areas of the brain used for speaking and remembering.
  • Writing down, at the time, the hour, the medication, and the lab tests for each episode. That would make it possible to check whether a fever, a drug, or a change in the blood triggers it.
  • Having it judged by people who don’t know the patient. That way, the family’s wish to see their loved one again wouldn’t play a part.

How often lucidity before death has been described

The figures available, where they come from, and what they measure. Each one counts something different.

Lucidity before death in different studies
StudyHow it was doneWhat it found
Julius, 1844The 139 patients who died in a British asylum between 1796 and 184113 in 100 died in a considerably better mental state
Brayne et al., 2008Questions to nurses and care assistants at an English nursing home7 in 10 had seen it in five years
Macleod, 2009100 consecutive deaths at a hospice in New Zealand6 patients, in the 48 hours before death
Lim et al., 2020The medical records of 338 deaths at a university hospital in South Korea6 cases
Batthyány and Greyson, 2021Online survey of caregivers who had seen an episode124 cases with dementia, and 94 in 100 died within the following week
Gilmore-Bykovskyi et al., 2025Months of video of 19 people with very advanced dementia9 lucid moments in 3 people, from 9 days to 20 months before death

What these figures don’t tell

  • They don’t use the same definition. Some count patients confused for any reason, and others count only people with dementia.
  • Almost all of them depend on what someone remembered or wrote down afterward. Only the 2025 study recorded the episodes as they happened.
  • The 2021 survey doesn’t give a frequency. Only caregivers who had seen an episode responded, so it isn’t known in how many patients it didn’t happen.
  • The Macleod and Lim figures are taken from how Batthyány and Greyson summarize them in 2021.

Frequently asked questions

How long before death does terminal lucidity appear?

In the accounts, almost always shortly before. A 2021 survey of caregivers gathered 124 cases of people with dementia, and 94 in 100 died within the following week. In 2025, a study filmed people with very advanced dementia. It found lucid moments between 9 days and 20 months before their death. We go over it with more studies in “What is terminal lucidity?”.

Has terminal lucidity been seen in people who are brain-dead?

No. The psychologist Alexander Batthyány, who studies terminal lucidity, wrote in 2023 that no such case is known. All the patients with terminal lucidity were alive, and their brains were working. He wrote this to correct a book by Raymond Moody and Paul Perry that said the opposite.

Where this page comes from

The study

  • Michael Nahm, Bruce Greyson, Emily Williams Kelly, and Erlendur Haraldsson, “Terminal lucidity: A review and a case collection,” Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 55:138–142 (2012)View in the journal (paywalled)
  • Michael Nahm, “Terminal lucidity in people with mental illness and other mental disability: An overview and implications for possible explanatory models,” Journal of Near-Death Studies 28(2):87–106 (2009)Read for free
  • Michael Nahm and Bruce Greyson, “Terminal lucidity in patients with chronic schizophrenia and dementia: A survey of the literature,” Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 197(12):942–944 (2009)View in the journal (paywalled)
  • Michael Nahm and Bruce Greyson, “The death of Anna Katharina Ehmer: A case study in terminal lucidity,” Omega 68(1):77–87 (2014)View in the journal (paywalled)

What came next

  • George Mashour et al., “Paradoxical lucidity: A potential paradigm shift for the neurobiology and treatment of severe dementias,” Alzheimer’s & Dementia 15(8):1107–1114 (2019)Read for free
  • Alexander Batthyány and Bruce Greyson, “Spontaneous remission of dementia before death: Results from a study on paradoxical lucidity,” Psychology of Consciousness 8(1):1–8 (2021)View in the journal (paywalled)
  • John Paul Ross, Stephen Post, and Laurel Scheinfeld, “Lucidity in the deeply forgetful: A scoping review,” Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 98:3–11 (2024)Read for free
  • Alexander Batthyány, “Terminal lucidity: The need for accuracy and integrity,” letter in Journal of Near-Death Studies 41(1):67–71 (2023)Read for free
  • Michael Nahm, “Defining terminal lucidity: Taking the need for accuracy and integrity seriously,” letter in Journal of Near-Death Studies 42(1):70–78 (2024)Read for free

Assessments and critiques

  • Neuroskeptic, “Terminal lucidity: Myth, mystery or miracle?” Discover (2014)Read
  • Ariel Zeleznikow-Johnston, “Terminal lucidity: when dying dementia patients regain awareness,” Psyche (2026)Read
  • Michael Shermer, with a text by Steven Pinker, “The soul of the gaps,” Skeptic (2025)Read

To understand more

  • What is terminal lucidity? How often it happens, how long it lasts and why, with all the studiesRead
  • People with dementia who suddenly speak again: the Gilmore-Bykovskyi studyRead
  • What does science say about near-death experiences?Read

Our archive

  • A full reading of the 2012 article, the 2009 and 2014 articles, and the 2021 survey, compared page by page, as of November 1, 2026

More studies

To start: