Skip to content
portalecm Search

A real-life case · Sri Lanka, 1972

Sujith Jayaratne’s reincarnation case

Sujith Jayaratne was about two years old when he began saying that in another life he was called “Gorakana Sammy” and that a lorry had killed him. A Buddhist monk wrote down what he said, with dates, and then went looking for that family. In Gorakana he found that a man named Sammy Fernando had died after being run over by a lorry six months before Sujith was born.

It is the third in our top 5 reincarnation cases. It has something almost no other case has. A monk who belonged to neither family wrote down what the boy said before checking anything. His notes are dated. Almost everything he wrote down turned out to be true. We tell it step by step and then look at what can be checked. If you only want the evidence, skip straight to what can be checked. Did Sujith remember the life of a man he never met?

Step 1

1970 · Sujith is eight months old · Told by his mother

A baby who only drinks his milk if he hears the word “lorry”

Illustration from Sujith Jayaratne’s reincarnation case: “A baby who only drinks his milk if he hears the word “lorry””

Sujith Lakmal Jayaratne was born on August 7, 1969, in Sri Lanka, near the capital, Colombo. His parents separated within a few months. Sujith stayed with his mother at his grandmother’s house in Mount Lavinia, a seaside city south of Colombo.

When Sujith was eight months old, his mother found something out by chance. One day the boy wouldn’t drink his milk. While talking to someone else, she said the word “lorry,” which is what a truck is called in Sri Lanka. Then the boy drank his milk. From then on, whenever he refused it, she said that word. According to his mother, it was the only way to get him to drink it. She thought the boy was afraid of lorries.

Soon after, Sujith began to talk.

Step 2

1971 · Sujith is about two years old · Told by his mother and his grandmother

Sujith says he was called “Gorakana Sammy” and that a lorry killed him

Illustration from Sujith Jayaratne’s reincarnation case: “Sujith says he was called “Gorakana Sammy” and that a lorry killed him”

According to his mother and his grandmother, as soon as he began to speak in sentences, Sujith talked about another life. He said he lived in a place called Gorakana and that he was called “Gorakana Sammy.” He said his father was named Jamis and had a bad eye, and that he had a wife, Maggie, who he argued with.

He also said he had worked on the trains and sold arrack, a local liquor. One day he went to a shop to buy tobacco, stepped onto the road, and a lorry hit him. His grandmother gave two versions. In one, the boy also talked about an argument with Maggie just before. In the other, he didn’t. He still spoke very little, so he sometimes used noises and gestures. To say he had worked on the trains, he imitated the sound of a locomotive.

He asked to be taken to Gorakana, and he asked for arrack and cigarettes. His family didn’t know anyone in Gorakana and didn’t know whether any of it was true.

A great-uncle of the boy was a monk at a nearby temple.

Step 3

March 10 and 11, 1972 · Told by the notes of the monk Wattarappola Nandaratana

A monk writes down, with dates, what the boy says

Illustration from Sujith Jayaratne’s reincarnation case: “A monk writes down, with dates, what the boy says”

Sujith’s great-uncle heard the boy and told a younger monk at his temple, Wattarappola Nandaratana. This monk was not part of the family, and he wanted to check what Sujith said. On March 10 and 11, 1972, he talked with the boy and wrote down in his notes, with dates, 13 things he said.

Sujith said he lived in Gorakawatte, a part of Gorakana, and that his father, Jamis, was missing his right eye. He said that in that other life he gave money to a woman named Kusuma to cook him a dish of steamed dough. And he said he gave money to the Forest Temple, where two monks lived, and one was called Amitha.

On March 13, the monk went to Gorakana to look for that family.

Step 4

March 13 to 18, 1972 · Told by the monk’s notes and the psychiatrist Ian Stevenson

The monk goes to Gorakana and finds Sammy Fernando’s family

Illustration from Sujith Jayaratne’s reincarnation case: “The monk goes to Gorakana and finds Sammy Fernando’s family”

Gorakana is 12 kilometers south of Mount Lavinia. On March 13, the monk did not find the family. There he talked with a girl named Kusuma Dabare and told her some of the things the boy said. At that moment, she didn’t connect them with her family. The next day, the monk saw Sujith again and wrote down 3 more things. According to the monk, before checking anything, the boy also told him that his house had a tiled roof, and the monk did not write that down.

On March 15, Kusuma went to Mount Lavinia. She confirmed some of the things Sujith said and asked to meet him. The psychiatrist Ian Stevenson, who studied the case afterward, assumes Kusuma had talked it over with her own family beforehand.

Kusuma was the niece of Sammy Fernando, a man from Gorakana. The monk went back there on March 16 and 18, and said he had checked almost everything he had written down. He checked it alone, and it is not known who he talked to.

The monk now knew who Sammy Fernando had been.

Step 5

1919 to 1969 · Told by Sammy’s family and the police records

Sammy Fernando, the man a lorry ran over in 1969

Illustration from Sujith Jayaratne’s reincarnation case: “Sammy Fernando, the man a lorry ran over in 1969”

Sammy Fernando was born in Gorakana in 1919. He was the eldest son of Jamis Fernando. He worked on the state railways until he was fired, around the age of 25. After that he made his living by secretly making arrack and selling it along the river by boat. The police arrested him eight times.

According to his family, Sammy drank heavily and became violent. When he argued with his wife, Maggie, she left the house and walked down the road, and sometimes he followed her. He was generous to the poor and to monks, and he gave money to his favorite niece, Kusuma.

On January 29, 1969, Sammy came home drunk and argued with Maggie. She went out onto the road and he went after her. He stopped at a shop to buy tobacco with his brother-in-law, stepped onto the road, and a lorry hit him. He died an hour or two later in the hospital. Stevenson checked the date in the police records.

Sujith was born six months later, 12 kilometers away. His mother said the pregnancy had lasted seven months.

The news spread through Gorakana, and the visits began.

Step 6

1972 to 1973 · Told by the monk, the families, and Ian Stevenson

The families meet, and Stevenson checks the case

Illustration from Sujith Jayaratne’s reincarnation case: “The families meet, and Stevenson checks the case”

On March 30, Kusuma arrived in Mount Lavinia with ten people from Gorakana. Sujith got scared, clung to his mother, and said nothing. The next day she came back with only four, and according to the monk, Sujith called her by her name. In April, the monk took the boy to Gorakana, and the case appeared in the Sri Lankan newspapers.

Stevenson investigated the case in 1973 and saw the monk’s original notes. He checked that in a photo Jamis had a spot on his right eye. The neighborhood of Sammy’s parents used to be called Gorakawatte. And when Sammy was alive, two monks lived at the Forest Temple, and one was called Taldena Amithasara. That name, Forest Temple, had fallen out of use around 1910, except among older people.

Stevenson also found two people from Sujith’s neighborhood who knew Sammy. A former drinking companion of Sammy’s had lived less than 100 meters away since 1971 and sometimes came into the boy’s house. And one of Sammy’s sisters lived about 250 meters away. Both of them, and Sujith’s family, say they never talked about Sammy in front of the boy.

The question from the beginning remains. Did Sujith remember the life of Sammy Fernando?

What does the evidence say?

What can be checked

We ask every case the same five questions. They help us find out whether what the child said was written down before the other person was found, and whether that can be shown. Here we ask them about what Sujith said about Sammy Fernando.

4 of 5
  • Yes
  • Unconfirmed
  • No data
  1. Did anyone write down what Sujith Jayaratne said before Sammy Fernando’s family confirmed it?Yes. A Buddhist monk who belonged to neither family wrote down 13 things on March 10 and 11, 1972, before going to Gorakana. He wrote down 3 more on the 14th, the day after his first trip. No one in Sammy’s family confirmed anything until the 15th. The psychiatrist Ian Stevenson saw the original notes.
  2. Is it known when the monk wrote down what Sujith Jayaratne said?Yes. The monk’s notes are dated March 10, 11, and 14, 1972. According to the monk, before checking anything the boy told him that his house had a tiled roof, and the monk did not write that down. That suggests he didn’t touch up the notes afterward, because if he had, he would have added that hit.
  3. Are there documents on the life and death of Sammy Fernando?Yes. Stevenson read in the police records that Sammy died after being run over on January 29, 1969. His birth certificate says he was born on January 8, 1919, and his horoscope says January 3.
  4. Does anyone outside confirm what Sujith Jayaratne said about Sammy Fernando?The same monk who had written it down checked it, and it is not known who he talked to in Gorakana. Stevenson later talked with Sammy’s mother and with the monks of his temple, who knew his life. But by then the two families had already met.
  5. Can it be ruled out that Sujith Jayaratne heard about Sammy Fernando in his neighborhood?It cannot be fully ruled out. A former drinking companion of Sammy’s lived less than 100 meters from Sujith, and one of Sammy’s sisters about 250. They and the boy’s family say they never talked about Sammy. That is all there is to rule it out, and no one could check it.

Why we ask each question

When did each thing happen?

This is what was written down and when, from oldest to newest:

  • January 29, 1969. A lorry runs over Sammy Fernando in Gorakana. The police records say so.
  • August 7, 1969. Sujith is born. The hospital certificate says so.
  • March 10 and 11, 1972. The monk writes down 13 things the boy says.
  • March 13, 1972. The monk goes to Gorakana and talks with Kusuma, without finding the family.
  • March 14, 1972. The monk writes down 3 more things the boy says.
  • March 15, 1972. Kusuma goes to Mount Lavinia and confirms some things.
  • March 16 and 18, 1972. The monk returns to Gorakana and checks almost everything.
  • 1973. Stevenson investigates the case and sees the original notes.

What is hard to explain

  • A monk who belonged to neither family wrote down what the boy said before checking anything. His notes are dated, and Stevenson saw them and had them translated.
  • Stevenson accepted all 16 things the monk wrote down, the 13 from the start and the 3 from March 14. Two of them fit only if they are interpreted. Counting what the boy said afterward too, he counts 36 hits and one miss, the one about dying on the spot.
  • The monk did not write down the hit about the tiled roof. That suggests he didn’t touch up the notes afterward, because if he had, the logical thing would have been to add that hit.
  • Some details were hard to know. The name Gorakawatte was old, and Kusuma didn’t know it. The name Forest Temple had hardly been used for 60 years.
  • According to his family, as a baby Sujith was afraid of lorries, and as a small child he asked for arrack and cigarettes. Stevenson saw part of that behavior with his own eyes when Sujith was three and a half.

What remains unresolved

  • The monk checked what he had written down alone, and it is not known who he talked to. Stevenson arrived a year later, when the families already knew each other.
  • The 3 things from March 14 were written down the day after his first trip to Gorakana. They are not entirely from before the search.
  • A drinking companion of Sammy’s lived less than 100 meters from the boy, and one of Sammy’s sisters about 250. They say they didn’t talk about him, but no one could check it.
  • Brooke Noel Moore is a philosopher who wrote a book about life after death in 1981. He suggested that Sujith may have heard a few names from a neighbor. From there, the family would have filled in the story. Moore does not document any contact.
  • Sujith was born on August 7, 1969, a little more than six months after Sammy died. His mother said the pregnancy lasted seven months, and no one has confirmed it. If so, the pregnancy had already begun before Sammy died. In Sri Lanka, rationalists and Buddhists argued about this in the press. Stevenson saw it as a side issue. For him, reincarnation allows the other personality to join the body at different points in the pregnancy. Moore, on the other hand, sees it as a serious objection. According to Moore, there was a time when that embryo was not Sammy.
  • Sammy did not die on the spot, as the boy said, but an hour or two later in the hospital.
  • The person who told the monk about the boy was a great-uncle of Sujith’s. And when the families met, according to those present, the boy recognized several people. On many of those occasions, there were people around who could have given him clues.
  • That an ordinary explanation is possible doesn’t mean it explains the case. With these data, it can’t be shown that Sujith remembered Sammy’s life. Nor can it be shown that he got it from what he heard in his neighborhood.

Frequently asked questions

Who is Sujith Jayaratne?

Sujith Lakmal Jayaratne was born in Sri Lanka in 1969. At about age two, he began saying that in another life he was called “Gorakana Sammy” and that a lorry had killed him. A Buddhist monk wrote down what he said in 1972, and the psychiatrist Ian Stevenson published the case in 1977.

Who was Sammy Fernando?

Sammy Fernando was a man from Gorakana, in Sri Lanka, born in 1919. He worked on the trains and later made and sold arrack, a liquor. He died after being run over by a lorry on January 29, 1969, six months before Sujith was born.

Has the Sujith Jayaratne case been proven?

No. A monk wrote down what the boy said before checking it, and almost all of it fit Sammy’s life. But the same monk did the checking, and two people who knew Sammy lived near the boy. Here we explain what can be checked.

What did Ian Stevenson think of the Sujith Jayaratne case?

Stevenson wrote that this case is more reliable than most in one respect: almost everything the boy said, he said before the two families met. After talking with Sammy’s drinking companion, who lived near the boy, he thought it unlikely that Sujith knew about Sammy through him.

Where this story comes from

The books and the studies

  • Ian Stevenson, Cases of the Reincarnation Type. Volume II: Ten Cases in Sri Lanka (1977). Sujith’s case is on pages 235 to 280
  • H. H. Jürgen Keil and Jim B. Tucker (2005), “Children Who Claim to Remember Previous Lives: Cases with Written Records Made before the Previous Personality Was Identified,” Journal of Scientific Exploration
  • Brooke Noel Moore, The Philosophical Possibilities Beyond Death (1981), pages 167 to 178. The critique of the case. We have not read it. We cite it from the summary by James Matlock, a researcher of these cases, in the Psi Encyclopedia, an encyclopedia on parapsychology, and from the one by Paul Edwards
  • Paul Edwards, Reincarnation: A Critical Examination (1996), pages 258 and 259. He summarizes Moore’s critique, including the point about the length of the pregnancy

Learn more

  • Reincarnation: the cases we have studiedRead
  • Reincarnation: the top 5 people who remember past livesRead

Our archive

  • Our reading of the case in the books by Stevenson and Edwards and in the article by Keil and Tucker, and the scoring against our five criteria, as of November 10, 2026

Keep reading

See all reincarnation cases

Reincarnation: The top 5 people who remember past lives

We asked them the same five questions as this story. A 32-page PDF, free in your inbox.

To start: