Skip to content
portalecm Search

Six studies · from 1992 to 2023

Distressing NDEs in six studies: how common they are and what is known about them

A near-death experience, or NDE, is a very intense experience that some people have when they are about to die. Most people describe peace and light, but some describe fear, an endless void, or scenes that look like hell. Researchers call these distressing NDEs. Six studies published between 1992 and 2023 have tried to describe them and count them. Their figures range from 11 to 23 out of 100 NDEs, and on this page we explain why they vary so much. We also cover what the studies have found about who has them, how they are remembered, and what might play a part.

The question on this page is: how many NDEs are distressing, and what do we really know about them? We go through the studies in order, from the oldest to the most recent. If you only want to know what is known, skip straight to the results.

Step 1

Before 1992 · The question

For years, hardly anyone asked about frightening NDEs

Illustration from Distressing NDEs in six studies: how common they are and what is known about them: “For years, hardly anyone asked about frightening NDEs”

The first books on NDEs, in the 1970s, talked almost only about peace, light, and kind beings. In 1984, the psychologist Kenneth Ring wrote that unpleasant NDEs were at most one in a hundred. A Gallup poll in the United States gave a similar figure.

Other researchers found many more. In 1979, the psychologist Charles Garfield interviewed 36 people a few days after they had come close to death. Eight described nightmarish visions. In 1981, a study in the northwestern United States found 11 partly negative experiences out of 55.

The figures did not match, and nobody was quite sure what to count as a distressing NDE.

Two researchers decided to start by describing them.

Step 2

1992 · Greyson and Bush · As the study tells it

From 50 accounts, Greyson and Bush describe three types of distressing NDE

Illustration from Distressing NDEs in six studies: how common they are and what is known about them: “From 50 accounts, Greyson and Bush describe three types of distressing NDE”

The psychiatrist Bruce Greyson had created the scale used to measure NDEs. In 1992, he and the researcher Nancy Evans Bush published the first study devoted to these experiences. Over ten years, about 30 people had written to them on their own to tell them about a terrifying NDE. The two then placed a notice in the newsletter of the International Association for Near-Death Studies. In all, they gathered 50 accounts.

From these accounts they described three types:

  • The inverse NDE. It has the same features as a pleasant NDE, such as leaving the body, a tunnel, or a light, but the person goes through it in terror. Often what frightens them is losing control. Some become calm when the person stops resisting.
  • The void. The person feels they are ceasing to exist, or that they are alone forever in an endless nothingness. Sometimes they feel they are being told that their life was never real. According to the authors, most of these happened to women giving birth under anesthesia.
  • The hellish NDE. The person sees dark landscapes and frightening beings, or falls down a pit. According to the authors, these were the least common among their accounts.

This study gives no percentage. The 50 accounts were gathered precisely because they were distressing, so they cannot show how many NDEs are distressing. Nor do they say how many accounts there are of each type.

That same year, another researcher gave a figure based on her interviews.

Step 3

1992 · Atwater · As she tells it

Atwater counts 105 distressing cases among more than 700 people she interviewed

Illustration from Distressing NDEs in six studies: how common they are and what is known about them: “Atwater counts 105 distressing cases among more than 700 people she interviewed”

Phyllis Atwater is an American researcher who had been interviewing people with an NDE since 1978. She had had three herself, all three pleasant. In 1992, she wrote an opinion piece in the journal of NDE studies.

In it she says that, among more than 700 people she had asked, 105 had a distressing experience. That is about 15 out of 100. She does not explain how she chose these people or what she counted as distressing, because it is not a study with a method.

Atwater noticed other things. None of the children she interviewed described anything terrifying. Nobody described fire to her. They described cold. And the same scene could be joyful for one person and horrible for another. She also suggested that hellish NDEs happen mostly to people who carry guilt or expect punishment. She gave no data to back this up.

Seventeen years later, Nancy Evans Bush brought together all the published figures.

Step 4

2009 · Bush · As her review tells it

Bush adds up thirty years of studies and concludes they may be between 15 and 19 out of 100

Illustration from Distressing NDEs in six studies: how common they are and what is known about them: “Bush adds up thirty years of studies and concludes they may be between 15 and 19 out of 100”

In 2009, Nancy Evans Bush wrote the chapter on distressing NDEs in the standard reference book on NDEs, the Handbook of Near-Death Experiences. She went over the studies published since 1975.

She found 9 studies, with 459 people, in which nobody described a distressing NDE. And another 12 studies, with 1,369 people, in which 315 did. In those 12 studies, that is 23 out of 100. She does not say which studies they are, or how many cases each one contributes.

These studies were done in very different ways. Some asked all the patients in a hospital, and others collected accounts from people who wrote in on their own. Some were looking specifically for distressing experiences.

Her final conclusion is more cautious than that 23 out of 100. She writes that distressing NDEs are more common than was believed, and that they may be in the “mid- to high teens” out of 100. That means between 15 and 19. In the Psi Encyclopedia, an online encyclopedia, she does the calculation with all 21 studies together. These are the 9 with no distressing NDEs and the 12 with some, and she gets 17 out of 100. She also writes that there is no evidence that they are a punishment for having done something wrong.

The studies that followed looked at more specific groups of people.

Step 5

2015 · Liège · As the study tells it

With an injury at the base of the brain, NDEs bring much less peace

Illustration from Distressing NDEs in six studies: how common they are and what is known about them: “With an injury at the base of the brain, NDEs bring much less peace”

Locked-in syndrome is when a person is conscious but cannot move or speak. They can only move their eyes. It is caused by an injury to the brainstem, the lower part of the brain that connects it to the spinal cord.

In 2015, the neuropsychologist Vanessa Charland-Verville and her team at the University of Liège, in Belgium, looked for people with this syndrome. They asked 14 who remembered something from their coma. Eight described an NDE. The team compared them with 23 people who had an NDE after a coma caused by an injury to another part of the brain.

Peace was felt by 3 of the 8 people with locked-in syndrome, and by 22 of the 23 in the other group. It was the only clear difference. On average, they described their NDE about 19 years after having it.

The authors give two possible explanations and do not choose between them. One is that the injury changes how the brain areas that control emotions work. The other is that waking up trapped in a body that does not move would take the peace away from anyone.

This study did not measure fear. The scale they used only asks about pleasant features, so it shows less peace, not more distress.

Four years later, the same Liège group compared how distressing NDEs are remembered.

Step 6

2019 · Liège · As the study tells it

Among 123 people who had been in a coma, 17 describe a distressing NDE

Illustration from Distressing NDEs in six studies: how common they are and what is known about them: “Among 123 people who had been in a coma, 17 describe a distressing NDE”

In 2019, the neuropsychologist Helena Cassol and the Liège group reviewed the accounts they had received since 2010. They used only those from people who had been in a coma for more than an hour and admitted to the ICU. Their experience also had to reach the minimum score on Greyson’s scale to count as an NDE. In all, 123 people met these conditions.

To find out whether an NDE was distressing, they asked how the person’s emotions felt at the time, from very negative to very positive. They were negative in 17 of the 123. That is about 14 out of 100. Eight were inverse NDEs, 8 were hellish, and only 1 was a void. Unlike in Greyson and Bush’s accounts, the rarest type was the void.

People remembered distressing NDEs with the same detail and the same clarity as pleasant ones. Distressing and pleasant NDEs had almost the same features, except for peace and joy.

There was one more difference. Four of the 17 people with a distressing NDE had it after a suicide attempt. Among the 106 with a pleasant NDE, only one did. The authors suggest that what the person was feeling beforehand might influence how they experience it.

The authors warn that these people came forward on their own, so the figure may not apply to everyone.

The largest study was published by Bruce Greyson in 2023.

Step 7

2023 · Virginia · As the study tells it

In 546 Virginia accounts, 58 are distressing, and the only thing that stands out is resisting

Illustration from Distressing NDEs in six studies: how common they are and what is known about them: “In 546 Virginia accounts, 58 are distressing, and the only thing that stands out is resisting”

In 2023, Bruce Greyson published an overview of distressing NDEs with new data from the University of Virginia’s collection. It holds 546 accounts that people sent in on their own. Of these, 437 were pleasant, 51 neutral, and 58 distressing. That is about 11 out of 100.

Greyson looked at whether distressing NDEs were linked to sex, age, childhood, or cause. He also looked at religion, mood, and suicide attempts. He found no clear link with any of these.

The only thing that stood out was the person’s attitude just before the experience. Among those who wanted to let go, 6 out of 100 were distressing. Among those who were fighting to stay in control, 17 out of 100 were.

Greyson also points out that the scales for measuring NDEs were designed with pleasant ones in mind. As a result, some distressing NDEs do not score high enough to count as NDEs.

That leaves the question we started with: how many NDEs are distressing? Let’s look at what is known and what isn’t.

What is known?

What the studies of distressing NDEs show

What they show

  • Distressing NDEs are not rare. The studies give between 11 and 23 out of 100 NDEs. The most recent studies, with the most people, give between 11 and 17.
  • There are at least three types. The inverse NDE, the void, and the hellish NDE. Greyson and Bush described them, and the Liège group found them again.
  • They are remembered in the same detail as pleasant ones. The 2019 Liège study found this.
  • There is no evidence that they are a punishment. They have nothing to do with religion or with how the person has lived, according to Bush and Greyson.
  • Resisting seems to matter. NDEs were distressing almost three times as often among those fighting to stay in control as among those who let go. Greyson found this in the Virginia collection.

What isn’t known

  • The real figure. Almost all the accounts were sent in by people who chose to, and many people keep a distressing NDE to themselves.
  • Whether they are measured well. The scales were designed for pleasant NDEs, and some distressing ones do not score high enough to count.
  • Why some people have them and others don’t. Only the attitude just before and, in one study, a suicide attempt stand out.
  • What role the brain plays. The injury in the 2015 study goes along with less peace, but being trapped in a body that cannot move would also explain it.
  • Whether the three types are three different things. No large study has counted how many there are of each type.

How each side interprets it

Those who look for the cause in the person or in their brain

  • Vanessa Charland-Verville and the Liège group, in 2015. They suggest that an injury to the brainstem might change how emotions are experienced, although they do not rule out that it comes from being paralyzed.
  • Helena Cassol and the Liège group, in 2019. They suggest that what the person feels and expects beforehand, for example after a suicide attempt, can color the experience.

Those who see them as the same phenomenon as pleasant NDEs

  • Nancy Evans Bush and Bruce Greyson, in the 2009 review and in a joint article in 2014. They believe the cause is still unknown, and that distressing NDEs are as real to the people who have them as pleasant ones. They reject the idea that they are a punishment.
  • Phyllis Atwater, in 1992. She believes hellish NDEs have to do with guilt or fears the person carries. She gives no data to back this up, and Bush later writes that there is no evidence that they are a punishment.

What can be said from the data

Distressing NDEs occur in every group studied, and they are not a rarity. The studies give between 11 and 23 out of 100. The most recent studies, with the most people, give between 11 and 17. The highest figures come from adding up studies done in very different ways. The lowest, of one in a hundred, come from the first researchers, who did not ask about them.

None of these figures applies to the whole population. Almost all the accounts were sent in by people who wanted to share their experience. And people who have a distressing NDE often keep it to themselves, so some are probably missing.

The data do not say what produces a distressing NDE, or what produces a pleasant one. Resisting, in Virginia, and having attempted suicide, in the Liège study, go along with more distressing NDEs. This fits with the idea that the state of mind influences the experience. That influence holds whether or not the brain produces the experience. The explanations from both sides are in What does science say about near-death experiences?

What would settle it

  • Asking every patient in a hospital, and soon. That way, the people who keep their experience to themselves would not be missing.
  • A scale that also asks about fear. That way, distressing NDEs would not be left out.
  • Counting how many there are of each type in a large group, with several people classifying each account separately.

The figures from each study and where they come from

How many distressing NDEs each study found, and how it gathered the people.

Distressing NDEs in six studies
StudyHow the people were gatheredDistressing
Greyson and Bush, 199250 accounts sent in by people who chose to, looking for distressing onesNo figure given
Atwater, 1992Interviews with more than 700 people, with no published method105, about 15 out of 100
Bush, 2009Total of 21 studies done in different waysAbout 17 out of 100. In 12 of those studies, 23
Charland-Verville, 20158 patients with locked-in syndromeDoes not measure distress. Peace in 3 of 8
Cassol, 2019123 accounts from people who had been in a coma, sent in by people who chose to17, about 14 out of 100
Greyson, 2023546 accounts from the Virginia collection, sent in by people who chose to58, about 11 out of 100

What these figures don’t tell you

  • Each study calls something different “distressing.” The Liège study uses a single question about emotions, the Virginia study looks at the tone of the account, and Atwater does not explain.
  • They are not figures for the whole population. None of them asked everyone who had come close to death.

Frequently asked questions

How many near-death experiences are distressing?

Nobody knows exactly. The studies give between 11 and 23 out of 100. The most recent studies, with the most people, give between 11 and 17. In the University of Virginia’s collection, 58 of 546 accounts were distressing. Almost all the accounts were sent in by people who chose to, and many people keep a distressing experience to themselves.

Is it true that one in five near-death experiences is distressing?

Not exactly. That figure comes from a 2009 review by Nancy Evans Bush, who found 23 out of 100 in 12 studies. But Bush herself concludes that they may be between 15 and 19 out of 100. When the studies with no distressing NDEs are also included, it comes to about 17 out of 100.

Why do some people have a distressing NDE and others don’t?

Nobody knows. In the University of Virginia’s collection, the only thing that stood out was the attitude just before. NDEs were distressing almost three times as often among those fighting to stay in control as among those who let go. In another study, from Liège in 2019, they were more common after a suicide attempt, which the Virginia study did not find.

Are distressing NDEs remembered the same way as pleasant ones?

Yes, according to a 2019 study from the University of Liège with 123 people. Distressing NDEs were remembered with the same detail and the same clarity as pleasant ones. And they had almost the same features, except for peace and joy.

Where this page comes from

The studies

  • Bruce Greyson and Nancy Evans Bush, “Distressing near-death experiences,” Psychiatry 55(1):95-110 (1992)View in the journal (paywalled)
  • Phyllis Atwater, “Is there a hell? Surprising observations about the near-death experience,” Journal of Near-Death Studies 10(3):149-160 (1992)Read for free
  • Nancy Evans Bush, “Distressing Western near-death experiences: finding a way through the abyss,” in The Handbook of Near-Death Experiences, Praeger, pp. 63-86 (2009)View at the publisher (paywalled)
  • Vanessa Charland-Verville and others, “Near-death experiences in patients with locked-in syndrome: not always a blissful journey,” Consciousness and Cognition 34:28-32 (2015)View in the journal (paywalled)
  • Helena Cassol and others, “A systematic analysis of distressing near-death experience accounts,” Memory 27(8) (2019)Read for free
  • Bruce Greyson, “The darker side of near-death experiences,” Journal of Scientific Exploration 37(4):683-698 (2023)Read for free

To understand more

  • Nancy Evans Bush and Bruce Greyson, “Distressing near-death experiences: the basics,” Missouri Medicine 111(6):486-490 (2014)Read for free
  • Nancy Evans Bush, “Distressing near-death experience,” Psi EncyclopediaRead for free
  • What happens when a near-death experience is frightening?Read
  • The Kondziella survey, in which 36 of 77 NDEs were unpleasantRead
  • Howard Storm’s storyRead

Our archive

  • A full reading of the six studies, checked page by page, as of October 30, 2026

More studies

To start: