Skip to content
portalecm Search

A real-life case · India, 1935

Shanti Devi’s reincarnation case

Shanti Devi was a girl from Delhi, in India. From the age of four, she said she had lived in another city, Mathura, married to a cloth merchant. At seven, she gave her husband’s name, and at eight, his address. A retired school principal wrote to that address. The reply came from a man whose wife had died ten years before that letter, shortly after giving birth.

It is the most famous reincarnation case in the world. In 1935, three Delhi residents took the girl to Mathura and wrote down everything she did. Indian newspapers reported it in those same days. We tell it step by step, with the 1935 press in front of us, and then look at what can be checked. If you only want the evidence, skip straight to what can be checked. Did Shanti Devi remember the life of a woman who died a year before she was born?

Step 1

Around 1930 · Shanti is about four years old · Told by the three residents who studied the case, in 1936

A Delhi girl says her home is in Mathura

Illustration from Shanti Devi’s reincarnation case: “A Delhi girl says her home is in Mathura”

Shanti Devi was born in December 1926 in Chirakhana, an old neighborhood of Delhi, in India. Her father was Rang Bahadur Mathur. According to her family, the girl hardly spoke until she was four. When she began to talk, she also began to say that she had lived in Mathura, a holy city about 145 kilometers from Delhi.

She said that there she belonged to the Chaube caste, a community of Brahmins closely tied to Mathura. Her husband had a cloth shop, and her house was yellow. She talked about the sweets she ate there and the clothes she wore. Her parents didn’t take it seriously, but she kept asking them to take her there.

For years, the girl didn’t say her husband’s name.

Step 2

Around 1934 · Shanti is seven years old · Told by the three residents, in 1936

Shanti whispers her husband’s name to an uncle

Illustration from Shanti Devi’s reincarnation case: “Shanti whispers her husband’s name to an uncle”

In India, a married Hindu woman doesn’t say her husband’s name, out of modesty. Shanti didn’t say it either. When her parents asked her, she answered that she would recognize him if she saw him. A great-uncle of hers, Bishan Chand, who was a teacher at a school in Delhi, promised to take her to Mathura if she told him. According to the three residents who studied the case, the girl whispered it in his ear: Kedar Nath Chaubey.

Bishan Chand didn’t take her. More than a year went by.

In the fall of 1935, someone decided to write to Mathura.

Step 3

October 1935 · Shanti is eight years old · Told by the three residents and the November newspaper

A school principal writes to the address the girl gives, and someone replies

Illustration from Shanti Devi’s reincarnation case: “A school principal writes to the address the girl gives, and someone replies”

Bishan Chand told the story to a friend, Lala Kishan Chand, a retired school principal who wasn’t part of the family. Kishan Chand went to see the girl. She gave him her husband’s address in Mathura and described the house. He wrote it down and sent a letter to that address.

The reply came from Kedar Nath Chaubey, a merchant in Mathura. He answered that what the letter said about the girl was true in its essentials. According to both families, his first wife, Lugdi, had died in October 1925 in Agra, a few days after giving birth to their son. Kedar Nath had later remarried.

No one has ever published that letter or the reply. They are known from what the three residents told later and from a newspaper of November 1935.

Kedar Nath suggested that a relative of his in Delhi go and see the girl.

Step 4

November 13, 1935 · Told by the three residents and the press of those days

Kedar Nath arrives in Delhi, and the girl cries for an hour

Illustration from Shanti Devi’s reincarnation case: “Kedar Nath arrives in Delhi, and the girl cries for an hour”

The first to see her was Kanji Mal, a relative of Kedar Nath who worked in Delhi. According to the three residents, the girl recognized him as her husband’s cousin and answered questions about the couple’s private life. According to a newspaper, she also told him about some money she had left buried in the house in Mathura.

On November 13, Kedar Nath arrived, with his son and his second wife. According to the three residents and the newspaper, Shanti recognized him as soon as she saw him and cried for an hour. The girl told Kedar Nath that, in her other life, she had promised to give 100 rupees of that money to the Dwarkadhish temple in Mathura. Kedar Nath and his son stayed in Delhi until November 15.

The news spread through Delhi. According to a newspaper, more than a hundred thousand people came by the girl’s house in a week.

Three Delhi residents decided to take her to Mathura.

Step 5

November 24, 1935 · Told by the three residents, in 1936

At Mathura station, the girl greets a man she had never met

Illustration from Shanti Devi’s reincarnation case: “At Mathura station, the girl greets a man she had never met”

The three residents were Deshbandhu Gupta, who ran a Delhi newspaper, and Tara Chand Mathur, a lawyer. The third was Neki Ram Sharma, a well-known nationalist leader with the title of pandit. They didn’t belong to either family. They traveled with the girl, her parents, and other people, fifteen in all, and a photographer. During the trip, they wrote down everything she did and said.

As the train approached Mathura, Shanti said that by the time they arrived, the doors of the Dwarkadhish temple would already be closed. She said it with an expression used in Mathura. On the platform, an older man dressed like the people of Mathura stopped in front of her. According to the three residents, the girl had never seen him. They asked her if she recognized him, and she got down from Gupta’s arms and touched his feet as a sign of respect. She whispered to them that he was her husband’s older brother. He was Babu Ram Chaubey, Kedar Nath’s brother.

Then they asked her to guide the car to her house.

Step 6

November 24, 1935 · Told by the three residents, in 1936

Shanti guides the car to the house and looks for her hidden money

Illustration from Shanti Devi’s reincarnation case: “Shanti guides the car to the house and looks for her hidden money”

The girl showed the way. Along the route, she pointed out buildings that, she said, hadn’t been there before, and she described a city gate to them before they reached it. She stopped the car at the entrance to an alley and pointed to a house. An older man, about 75 years old, was there. She called him father-in-law and bowed to him. He was Kedar Nath’s father. The house wasn’t yellow.

Then they took her to the family’s second house. In Delhi, the girl had talked about a well. She looked for it in the courtyard of that house and didn’t find it, but she pointed to a corner and said the well was there. Kedar Nath lifted a stone slab, and a well appeared that had been covered for years. Then the girl went upstairs, entered a room, and said the money was buried under a corner. They dug and, about thirty centimeters down, found an old hiding place for keeping valuables. It was empty. Later, according to the three residents, they learned that Kedar Nath had taken the money out when Lugdi died.

Finally, they took her to the house of Lugdi’s parents. According to the three residents, the girl recognized them among more than fifty people.

The case became famous all over India.

Step 7

1935 to 1987 · Told by the press, a skeptic in 1936, and the researchers

The three residents publish what they saw, and a skeptic isn’t convinced

Illustration from Shanti Devi’s reincarnation case: “The three residents publish what they saw, and a skeptic isn’t convinced”

On December 1, 1935, more than twenty thousand people went to a public meeting in a Delhi park. Gupta, Sharma, and Tara Chand said they were convinced and called for a scientific investigation. In March 1936, they published their account in the press, and later in a pamphlet.

In February 1936, Bal Chand Nahata, a skeptic, interviewed the girl and other people. He published a pamphlet in Hindi. He concluded that what was known didn’t allow anyone to say that Shanti remembered a previous life. In that interview, the girl also told him what she said she remembered between one life and the next. She spoke of smoke and of three men dressed in yellow. She said she saw the god Krishna sitting on a throne, reading a paper with the number of her house in Delhi.

Many books and websites today say that Gandhi chose those three residents. No newspaper or document from 1935 or 1936 says so. In November 1935, Gandhi was hundreds of kilometers away, in the town of Wardha. The story appears decades later. According to books from the 1940s, two of the three residents were indeed associates of his.

Shanti Devi never married. In 1986, she was interviewed by the psychiatrist Ian Stevenson, of the University of Virginia, together with the Indian researcher K. S. Rawat. She died in Delhi on December 27, 1987.

The question from the beginning remains. Did Shanti Devi remember Lugdi’s life?

What does the evidence say?

What can be checked

We ask every case the same five questions. They help us find out whether what the child said was written down before anyone knew who the person she talked about was, and whether what she said can be checked with evidence. Here we ask them about the name and address Shanti Devi gave.

2.5 of 5
  • Yes
  • Unconfirmed
  • No data
  1. Was what Shanti Devi said written down before Kedar Nath, the man she called her husband, was found?A retired school principal, Lala Kishan Chand, wrote down the address the girl gave and wrote to Kedar Nath in October 1935. The letter arrived, and he replied. But no one has published that letter, and it isn’t known what else it said. The rest of what the girl said before that is known from the account written later by the three Delhi residents who went with her to Mathura.
  2. Is it known when the letter to Kedar Nath was written?According to the three residents who went with her to Mathura, in October 1935, after a Hindu festival. A newspaper of November 20, 1935, confirms the order: first the letter, then the reply and the visits of Kedar Nath and his relative to Delhi, and then the trip to Mathura. No document gives the exact date of the letter.
  3. Are there documents on the life and death of Lugdi?For Lugdi, not a single document has been published. That she died in 1925, after giving birth, is what her family and her husband’s family say. Her widower, Kedar Nath, and his family did leave a trace: they appear in the 1935 press and in the photos of the trip to Mathura.
  4. Does anyone from outside confirm what Shanti Devi said about Lugdi?Three Delhi residents, who weren’t related to either family, went with her to Mathura. They checked the house, a covered well and a hiding place she pointed out, and the relatives. One of them lived near Shanti’s family, so he wasn’t a complete outsider. And that Lugdi existed and died that way is said only by the two families.
  5. Can it be ruled out that Shanti Devi heard about Kedar Nath before the letter?For the name and the address, no one has found how she could have learned them. According to a later biographer, her father said the girl never had contact with anyone from Mathura. The three residents’ account doesn’t say whether they looked for any. What she did in Mathura is another matter: before the trip, she spent three days with Kedar Nath’s family, and more than a hundred thousand people came by her house.

Why we ask each question

When did each thing happen?

This is what happened and what was written, from oldest to newest:

  • October 1925. Lugdi dies in Agra, days after giving birth, according to her family.
  • December 1926. Shanti Devi is born in Delhi.
  • Around 1930. She begins to say she lived in Mathura.
  • Around 1934. She tells her great-uncle her husband’s name.
  • October 1935. Kishan Chand writes to Kedar Nath, and he replies. Neither letter has been published.
  • November 13, 1935. Kedar Nath arrives in Delhi.
  • November 20, 1935. First news report in the press, four days before the trip.
  • November 24, 1935. Trip to Mathura.
  • February 22, 1936. Interview by the skeptic Bal Chand Nahata.
  • March 22, 1936. The three residents publish their account.
  • December 27, 1987. Shanti Devi dies in Delhi.

What is hard to explain

  • No source disputes that Kedar Nath’s name and address came from the girl before the letter. As far as is known, the skeptic Nahata didn’t dispute it either. The letter reached a man in Mathura who had lost his wife after she gave birth.
  • No one has found how the girl could have learned that name and that address. According to a later biographer, her father said the girl never had contact with anyone from Mathura. The three residents’ account doesn’t say whether they looked for any.
  • It isn’t a legend that grew over time. There are press reports from the same days and an account published four months after the trip, with names and dates that fit together.
  • The three residents who went with her didn’t belong to either family, and they wrote down what she did during the trip. According to them, the girl found the covered well and the hiding place in the house.
  • According to the three residents, she greeted a man on the platform whom she had never seen and said how he was related to her.

What remains unresolved

  • Nothing was written down of what the girl said before the letter of October 1935. It is known from the account of the three residents, who wrote it later and were already convinced.
  • The letter and Kedar Nath’s reply haven’t been published. It isn’t known what else the letter said, apart from the address.
  • It isn’t known how many men named Kedar Nath Chaubey there were in Mathura. The Chaube are a large community that is typical of that city. If there were many, it was easier for a letter with that name to find a widower who fit.
  • Before the trip, the girl spent three days with Kedar Nath and his family, and more than a hundred thousand people came by her house. She could have heard details about the house and the family there.
  • On the platform, they put the man in front of her and asked her if she recognized him. A question like that already gives a clue.
  • The house wasn’t yellow, and the money didn’t turn up. A later biographer says the house had been repainted. That Kedar Nath took the money out is what the three residents say, without explaining how they knew.
  • One of the three residents, Tara Chand Mathur, lived near Shanti’s family and belonged to the same caste, according to a later biographer. He wasn’t a relative, but he wasn’t a complete outsider to the family either.
  • Lugdi’s death is reported by her family and by Kedar Nath’s. No one has published a hospital or cremation record.
  • With these data, it can’t be shown that Shanti Devi remembered Lugdi’s life. Nor can it be shown that she got it from what she heard.

Frequently asked questions

Who was Shanti Devi?

Shanti Devi was born in Delhi in 1926 and died there in 1987. As a child, she said she had been Lugdi, a woman from Mathura who died in 1925, and in 1935 she was taken to that city to check. It is the most famous reincarnation case in the world.

Did Gandhi appoint the committee that investigated Shanti Devi?

There is no evidence from the time. The 1935 newspapers speak of three Delhi residents, and the account they published in 1936 doesn’t name Gandhi. The story of the appointment appears decades later.

What happened to the money Shanti Devi said she had hidden?

In the house in Mathura, she pointed to a corner, and under it an old hiding place for valuables turned up, but it was empty. According to the three residents who were with her, they later learned that the widower, Kedar Nath, had taken the money out when his wife died.

Has the Shanti Devi case been proven?

No. The girl gave the name and address of a real man, and in Mathura she recognized people and places. But what she said before the letter wasn’t written down, and before the trip she spent days with the family of the man she called her husband. Here we explain what can be checked.

Where this story comes from

The press of the time

  • The Bombay Chronicle, November 20 and 27 and December 2, 1935. The news about the case, from the same days
  • Deshbandhu Gupta, Neki Ram Sharma, and Tara Chand Mathur, the three residents’ account, published in The Bombay Chronicle on March 22, 1936
  • The same account, reproduced in the magazine The Theosophist, May 1936 (pp. 139-144) and September 1936 (pp. 549-550)Read for free

The books and studies

  • John Helen Manas, Metempsychosis (1941), chapter 16. It reproduces the three residents’ accountRead for free
  • Manly P. Hall, Reincarnation: The Cycle of Necessity (1946). It includes the part about the name and the letterRead for free
  • Ian Stevenson (1960), “The Evidence for Survival from Claimed Memories of Former Incarnations,” Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research
  • K. S. Rawat (1997), “The Case of Shanti Devi,” Venture Inward magazine. With his 1986 and 1987 interviewsRead
  • K. S. Rawat and Titus Rivas (2005), “The Life Beyond,” Journal of Religion and Psychical Research. It includes the skeptic Nahata’s interview
  • KM Wehrstein, “Shanti Devi (reincarnation case),” Psi Encyclopedia, from the Society for Psychical ResearchRead

Learn more

  • Reincarnation: the cases we have studiedRead

Our archive

  • Our reading of 446 issues of The Bombay Chronicle from 1935 and 1936, of the books and articles above, and of Gandhi’s schedule in his collected works, and the scoring against our five criteria, as of November 11, 2026

Keep reading

See all reincarnation cases

Reincarnation: The top 5 people who remember past lives

We asked them the same five questions as this story. A 32-page PDF, free in your inbox.

To start: